Small persistent humid forest clearings drive tropical forest biomass losses.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. A meta-analysis of carbon losses and gains from tropical moist forest degradation and regeneration.Science advances · 2026
   Pooled it
2. Fourfold increase in fragmentation from road expansion in Siberian intact forests since 2000.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
   Article
3. Alarming decline in the carbon sink of European forests driven by disturbances.National science review · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as