ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Psychological impact of forensic autopsy work: a cross-sectional analytic study of post-traumatic stress symptoms among forensic personnel in National Capital Region (NCR) Delhi.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionForensic professionals working in post-mortem centers are frequently exposed to traumatic events, making them susceptible to post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and related psychological distress. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of PTSS among forensic medicine specialists, residents, autopsy technicians, and support staff in the Delhi-NCR region. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted across sixteen post-mortem centers, enrolling 184 participants equally divided into four occupational groups. Data were collected using a structured sociodemographic questionnaire and the Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms Inventory (PTSSI). Statistical analyses were performed to identify associations between Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms (PTSS) scores and sociodemographic as well as occupational factors.
resultsThe mean age of participants was 38.5 years, with a male predominance (90.21%). The overall mean PTSS score was 9.68 (SD = 9.15), and only one participant met the criteria for PTSS. Higher PTSS scores were observed among autopsy technicians, involuntary workers, those with lower education, and participants who experienced fear during their first autopsy. Significant associations were found between PTSS scores and marital status, educational level, work attitude, workplace change requests, and negative family attitudes (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Although the prevalence of clinically significant PTSS was low, certain subgroups-especially autopsy technicians and involuntary workers-exhibited elevated PTSS. Emotional distress was linked to specific work experiences and negative societal perceptions. Cultural resilience and family support may contribute to the overall low PTSS rates. Conclusion: Targeted mental health interventions, regular psychological screening, and supportive workplace policies are recommended to safeguard the well-being of forensic professionals exposed to occupational trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41501188What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.