ArticleScientific reports2026
Molecular effects of digital psychological intervention for perinatal stress: cell culture, animal model validation, and machine learning-based biomarker identification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perinatal psychological stress significantly impacts maternal and fetal health through complex molecular pathways, yet the biological basis of digital health interventions for pregnant and postpartum women remains poorly understood. This study investigated molecular effects underlying digital psychological intervention effectiveness through cell culture experiments, animal models, and computational biomarker analysis relevant to obstetric populations. Cell culture studies using stress-responsive cellular models revealed that glucocorticoid exposure induced NR3C1 upregulation (2.3-fold, p = 0.003), FKBP5 elevation (3.1-fold, p < 0.001), and IL6 increase (2.7-fold, p = 0.002), while BDNF decreased by 39% (p = 0.012) and SLC6A4 decreased by 48% (p = 0.009). Intervention-simulating treatment partially restored BDNF expression to 0.85-fold of control levels (p = 0.023) and reduced IL6 to 1.4-fold above control (p = 0.007). Animal model validation confirmed that hippocampal BDNF showed 45% reduction under chronic stress (p < 0.001) with recovery to 82% following intervention (p = 0.009), while serum corticosterone decreased from 243.7 ± 42.1 ng/mL to 132.6 ± 28.4 ng/mL after intervention (p < 0.001). Machine learning ensemble methods achieved the highest predictive accuracy for intervention responsiveness with AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.94). Regional biomarker screening across 2,847 individuals identified 23 biomarkers with significant predictive contributions (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.01). These findings provide molecular frameworks for understanding digital psychological intervention effectiveness in perinatal care and support evidence-based personalized intervention strategies for pregnant and postpartum women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.