Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501167›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Cross-dataset late fusion of Camera-LiDAR and radar models for object detection.

Assem Ali, Mohamed M Tawfik, Mahmoud M Saafan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Assem AliMechatronics Engineering Program, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. assem.ali@std.mans.edu.eg.
Mohamed M TawfikMechanical Power Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mahmoud M SaafanComputers and Control Systems Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a modular late-fusion framework that integrates Camera, LiDAR, and Radar modalities for object classification in autonomous driving. Rather than relying on complex end-to-end fusion architectures, we train two lightweight yet complementary neural networks independently: a CNN for Camera + LiDAR using KITTI, and a GRU-based radar classifier trained on RadarScenes. A unified 5-class label space is constructed to align the heterogeneous datasets, and we verify its validity through class-distribution analysis. The fusion rule is formally defined using a confidence-weighted decision mechanism. To ensure statistical rigor, we conduct 3-fold cross-validation with three random seeds, reporting mean and standard deviation of mAP and per-class AP. Results show that the Camera + LiDAR model achieves a strong average mAP of 95.34%, while Radar achieves 33.89%, reflecting its robustness but lower granularity. Using the proposed late-fusion rule, performance increases to 94.97% mAP versus KITTI ground truth and 33.74% versus RadarScenes. Cross-validated per-class trends confirm complementary sensing: Camera + LiDAR excels at Cars, Bicycles, and Pedestrians, while Radar contributes stability under adverse conditions. The paper also provides a complexity and latency analysis, discusses dataset limitations, clarifies temporal handling for radar, and includes updated literature up to 2025. Findings show that lightweight late fusion can achieve high reliability while remaining computationally efficient, making it suitable for real-time embedded autonomous driving systems.

Identifiers

PMID41501167
PMCPMC12783090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.