Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501142›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhanced confocal microscopy with physics-guided autoencoders via synthetic noise modeling.

Zaheer Ahmad, Junaid Shabeer, Abdullah Hidayat, Usman Saleem, Tahir Qadeer, Abdul Sami, Zahira El Khalidi, Saad Mehmood, Shyam Pokharel, Osama Ahmed Rana and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zaheer AhmadDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Junaid ShabeerDepartment of Physics, Riphah International University, Islamabad, 46000, Pakistan.
Abdullah HidayatDepartment of Physics, Charles E. Schmidt College of Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, 33431-0991, USA.
Usman SaleemRoots IVY, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Tahir QadeerArid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, 46000, Pakistan.
Abdul SamiArid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, 46000, Pakistan.
Zahira El KhalidiDepartment of Physics, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Saad MehmoodDepartment of Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.
Shyam PokharelLynn Cancer Institute-Radiation Oncology, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, USA.
Osama Ahmed RanaDepartment of Electro-Optics and Photonics, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH, 45469, USA.
Bulent AydoganRadiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Wazir MuhammadDepartment of Physics, Charles E. Schmidt College of Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, 33431-0991, USA. wmuhammad@fau.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a Physics-guided deep learning framework to address common limitations in Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM), including diffraction-limited resolution, noise, and under sampling due to low laser power conditions. The optical system’s point spread function and primary CLSM image degradation mechanisms, namely photon shot noise, dark current noise, motion blur, speckle noise, and under sampling are explicitly incorporated into the model as physics-based constraints. A convolutional autoencoder is trained with a custom loss function that integrates these optical degradation processes, ensuring that the reconstructed images adhere to physical image formation principles. The model is evaluated on simulated CLSM datasets generated based on experimentally observed CLSM noise characteristics. Statistical comparisons, including intensity histograms, spatial frequency distributions, and structural similarity metrics, confirm that the synthetic dataset closely matches accurate CLSM data. The proposed approach is compared with traditional image reconstruction methods, including Richardson-Lucy deconvolution, non-negative least squares, and total variation regularization. Results indicate that the physics-constrained autoencoder improves structural detail recovery while maintaining consistency with known CLSM imaging physics. This study demonstrates that Physics-guided deep learning can provide an alternative computational approach to CLSM enhancement, complementing existing optical correction methods. Future work will focus on further validation using experimental CLSM acquisitions.

Indexed as

CLSM noise reductionComputational imagingConfocal laser scanning microscopyImage restorationOptical image formationPhysics-guided deep learning

Identifiers

PMID41501142
PMCPMC12873179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.