Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501119›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

The effect of the design of the irrigation needle used during endodontic treatment on postoperative pain: a randomize clinical trial.

Ayça Yersel, Damla Kırıcı

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07080918 (EFFECTS OF IRRIGATION NEEDLES WITH DIFFERENT DESIGNS USED DURING ENDODONTIC TREATMENT ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07080918 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of irrigation needles with different designs used during endodontic treatment on postoperative pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorAkdeniz UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled66ConditionsLower Molars With Irreversible PulpitisArmsIrrigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayça YerselDepartments of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
Damla KırıcıDepartments of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey. d_ozsu@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of irrigation needles with different designs on postoperative pain during endodontic treatment. This randomized clinical study was conducted on 66 patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of the mandibular molars. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the design of the irrigation needle used during root canal treatment. Open-ended irrigation needle was used in group 1, side-port closed-ended irrigation needle was used in group 2, and double side-port closed-ended irrigation needle was used in group 3. After completion of root canal treatment, preoperative and postoperative pain levels were evaluated at 6, 24, 48, 72 h and 7 days. The data were analyzed by the Pearson chi-square test and Fisher's exact tests. Postoperative pain was highest at 6 h in all groups. A significant decrease in pain over time was observed in all groups (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in postoperative pain were found between the groups at any time point (p > 0.05). The design of irrigation needles used during endodontic treatment does not appear to affect postoperative pain levels. Clinical trial registration: Registration number is "NCT07080918".

Indexed as

NeedlesPostoperative PainPulpitisRoot Canal TherapyTherapeutic IrrigationAdultFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementYoung AdultConventional needle irrigationIrrigation needle designPostoperative painSide-vented needle

Identifiers

PMID41501119
PMCPMC12864910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.