ArticleScientific reports2026
Freely foraging macaques value information in ambiguous terrains.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among non-human primates, macaques are recognized for thriving in a wide range of novel environments. Previous studies show macaques' affinity for new information. However, little is known about how information-seeking manifests in their spatial navigation pattern in ambiguous foraging terrains, where the location and distribution of the food are unknown. We investigated the spatial pattern of foraging in free-moving macaques in an ambiguous terrain, lacking sensory cues about the reward distribution. Rewards were hidden in a uniform grid of woodchip piles spread over a 15 sqm open terrain and spatially distributed according to different patchy distributions. We observed Lévy-like random walks in macaques' spatial search patterns, balancing relocation effort with exploration. Encountering rewards altered the foraging path to favor the vicinity of discovered rewards temporarily, without preventing longer-distance travels. These results point toward continuous exploration, suggesting that explicit information-seeking is a part of macaques' foraging strategy. We further quantified the role of information seeking using a kernel-based model, combining a map of ambiguity, promoting information seeking, with a map of discovered rewards and a map of proximity. Fitting this model to the foraging paths of our macaques revealed individual differences in their relative preference for information, reward, or proximity. The model predicted that a joint contribution of all three factors performs and adapts to an ambiguous terrain with scattered rewards, a prediction we confirmed using further experimental evidence. We postulate an explicit role for seeking information as a valuable entity to reduce ambiguity in macaques' foraging strategies, suggesting an ecologically valid way of foraging in ambiguous terrains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.