ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning assessment of retinal blood flow links metabolic dysfunction and accelerated microvascular aging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Herbal compounds in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: an updated systematic review.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-integrated multimodal retinal imaging for early detection and risk stratification of systemic vascular and neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microvascular aging impairs tissue perfusion and contributes to age-related organ dysfunction; however, direct approaches to assess microvascular aging remain limited. Here, we developed machine learning models to estimate chronological age from retinal blood flow data acquired by laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) in 1,008 adults undergoing health checkups. Using 18 predefined parameters and 3,253 automatically extracted time-series features, the best model for all participants achieved a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 10.3% between predicted and chronological age. In addition, sex-specific models for women and men outperformed the model for all participants (MAPE 8.6% in women and 9.3% in men), allowing us to explore sex differences in microvascular aging patterns. Based on bias-corrected residuals, we defined a novel biomarker, the relative microvascular aging index (rmVAI). Higher rmVAI was significantly associated with elevated blood pressure, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Individuals classified as "model-predicted older" (rmVAI > 10%) had higher fatty liver index values (mean 38.2 vs 26.7) and an approximately twofold higher prevalence of hepatic steatosis (26% vs 12%) than those classified as "model-predicted younger" (rmVAI < - 10%). Our LSFG-based machine learning framework provides a scalable and non-invasive tool for quantifying microvascular aging from retinal blood flow and suggests that MAFLD is a potent systemic contributor to accelerated microvascular aging, supporting a putative "liver-microvascular axis" that warrants further investigation for early risk stratification in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.