ArticleScientific reports2026
An intelligent hybrid deep learning-machine learning model for monthly groundwater level prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting groundwater level is necessary for environmental protection. Thus, our research suggests a hybrid artificial intelligence model that integrates the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, the coati optimization (COO) algorithm, the gated recurrent unit (GRU), and the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) to address these challenges. The new model, called PSO-COO-GRU-ANFIS (PCGA), operates in several steps. First, the model uses PSO-COO to set ANFIS and GRU parameters. Then, the model uses GRU to extract hidden patterns from the data. In the final step, the extracted patterns are input into ANFIS to generate predictions. Specifically, the proposed model is used to precisely forecast monthly groundwater levels (GWLs) in the Ardabil Plain, Iran. The PCGA is also compared with several benchmark models, and its accuracy is evaluated using multiple evaluation metrics. Our findings show that the PCGA model achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.90 and a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.90. The PCGA model enhances the MAE and NSE of all other prediction models by 14-77% and 1-20%, respectively. The results also highlight the effectiveness of the PSO-COO algorithm and the GRU model in improving forecast precision, as the hybrid optimization approach significantly reduced error fluctuations during parameter tuning, and the GRU demonstrated strong capability in capturing long-term temporal dependencies in groundwater level data. Overall, the findings of the current study show that the PCGA model is a robust tool for forecasting monthly groundwater levels. The PCGA model demonstrates superior predictive capability compared to conventional and standalone models. By combining the strengths of optimization algorithms, deep learning, and fuzzy inference systems, the model effectively captures nonlinear and dynamic relationships in groundwater level (GWL) data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.