ArticleNature communications2026
Phylogenomic profile of exon-intron organization across angiosperms, their relationships with protein domains, and functional implications.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eukaryotic genes usually encode proteins and contain exons in different size, including micro and small exon categories. However, genome-wide gene exon-intron organizations and their conservation across angiosperms have not been investigated. Among exons of protein-coding genes from 46 angiosperms and four gymnosperms, ~35% are micro and small exons affecting most genes and the remaining exons are defined here as medium, large, or super exons. Exon-intron structural comparison using our new bioinformatic tool, ExonEvo, reveals that, ~69% of conserved exons in homologous genes are found in two or more major angiosperm subgroups, including ~47% as the seed plant-wide conserved exons that are present in most genes in individual species. An examination of domain-exon correspondence revealed that most conserved protein domains match two or more conserved exon families and genes encoding the same domain family members can have different domain-exon correspondence. Moreover, most flower-preferential genes contain conserved exons and most exons with exon skipping during splicing are shared by seed plants, suggesting that alternative splicing of the exons could be a conserved mechanism for regulating protein structure. Our phylogenomic landscape of exon structure and domain-exon organization supports a model for conservation of exon/domain structure in relation to post-transcriptional regulation of gene/protein function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.