ReviewThe British journal of clinical psychology2026
Parents' experiences in accessing services for their autistic children in the United Kingdom: A meta-synthesis.
Review in The British journal of clinical psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParents of autistic children support their children through additional challenges, often experiencing adversity as a result. Such parents report high support needs, yet service provision is often limited. Services often support children through providing various psychological interventions to parents. Quantitative evidence for such interventions is mixed and qualitative evidence is sparse. This review therefore aimed to synthesise the perspectives of UK parents regarding interventions for their autistic child.
methodThe databases Scopus, Embase, Medline, PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science and ASSIA were searched in February 2025. Inclusion criteria constituted qualitative articles published in English from 2004 onwards exploring UK parents' perspectives of interventions aimed at supporting autistic children. Articles were evaluated using Standard Quality Assessment Criteria. Thematic meta-synthesis was conducted.
resultsFourteen papers were identified: eight high-quality, one medium-quality, and four low-quality. Interventions were psychoeducational behavioural, communication-based, sensory-related or mental-health based in nature. Themes included change, relationship with help, parents' need to process and solidarity.
conclusionsFacilitators of positive change included learning, empowerment, structure and rigour, while barriers included delivery issues and unhelpful information. Parents reported finding solidarity amongst similar parents helpful. Reflective space was deemed useful in facilitating new understanding of autistic lives. Methodological quality varied, with more reflexive and theoretically grounded research encouraged. Future research should also consider implementing embedding processes into qualitative designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.