Observational studyJournal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences2026
Multicenter Validation Study of the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for IgG4-Related Sclerosing Cholangitis 2020 in Japan.
Observational study in Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Multicenter Validation Study of the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for IgG4-Related Sclerosing Cholangitis 2020 in Japan".Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2026Article
- Reply to the Comment on "Multicenter Validation Study of the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for IgG4-Related Sclerosing Cholangitis 2020 in Japan".Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe diagnostic performance of clinical diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis 2020 (IgG4-SC2020) has not been fully validated since its proposal as a revision of the 2012 criteria (IgG4-SC2012).
methodsWe conducted a multicenter validation study to evaluate the diagnostic performance of IgG4-SC2020 using clinical data collected from 1034 patients with IgG4-SC and 447 patients with mimickers, including 143 with pancreatic cancer, 157 with primary sclerosing cholangitis, and 147 with cholangiocarcinoma in Japan.
resultsThe sensitivity of IgG4-SC2020 was significantly higher than that of IgG4-SC2012 (99.0% vs. 89.1%; p < 0.001). The specificities of both IgG4-SC2020 and IgG4-SC2012 were 100% for pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. For primary sclerosing cholangitis, the specificities of IgG4-SC2020 and IgG4-SC2012 were 97.5% and 100%, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.123). A total of 113 patients who could not be diagnosed according to the IgG4-SC2012 were successfully diagnosed using IgG4-SC2020. These diagnostic improvements were attributed to the inclusion of MRCP findings (n = 97), the absence of neoplastic cells on histology (n = 15), and the presence of IgG4-related kidney lesions (n = 1).
conclusionsThis Japanese multicenter validation study demonstrated that the diagnostic performance of IgG4-SC2020 was superior to that of IgG4-SC2012.
trial registrationUMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), UMIN000052984.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.