Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41500779›Full record

ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2025

[Integrative Analysis of Multi-source Public Databases to Screen Core Genes 
for Constructing A Prognostic Risk Model in Lung Adenocarcinoma].

Chengmeng Wang, Lu Zhang, Yu Zhang, Yu Wang, Meng Wang

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chengmeng Wang *Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy; Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin 300060, China.
Lu Zhang *Tianjin Children's Hospital; Children's Hospital, Tianjin University; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Birth Defects for Prevention and Treatment, Tianjin 300400, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy; Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin 300060, China.
Yu WangLaboratory of Tumor Cell Biology; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital; Tianjin 300060, China.
Meng WangDepartment of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy; Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin 300060, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) resistance poses a significant challenge in the targeted therapy of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), highlighting the need to identify key molecular markers associated with both drug resistance and prognosis to guide precision treatment. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying TKIs resistance in LUAD, identify core differentially expressed genes (DEGs), clarify the relationships between different gene clusters and patient survival/drug response, and construct and validate a prognostic risk model for LUAD, thereby providing a foundation for precision therapy and prognostic assessment.

methodsMultiple LUAD-related datasets, including GSE162045 and GSE114647, were integrated. Core overlapping DEGs were identified using Venn diagrams, and a gene correlation network was constructed. Consensus clustering was applied for sample grouping, combined with t-SNE dimensionality reduction to visually validate clustering stability and distinctness. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) were performed to explore the functional enrichment of DEGs. The 50% maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 12 drugs were compared across clusters to evaluate differences in drug sensitivity. Prognosis-related core genes were selected via LASSO regression to construct a risk model, whose performance was subsequently validated in the GSE31210 cohort using Sankey diagrams, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Expression differences of core genes among clusters and between risk groups were analyzed, and Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to assess the association between individual gene expression and survival. The expression of PLEK2 in LUAD tissues was analyzed based on multiple datasets (GSE19804, GSE19188, GSE44077, GSE30219), and its protein level in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs-resistant LUAD cell lines was detected by Western blot.

resultsTwelve core DEGs (e.g., HMGA1, PLEK2) were identified. When the cluster number (K) was set to 2, samples were stably divided into Cluster A and Cluster B. The expression of 10 core genes was significantly different between the two clusters (P<0.0001), and the patients in Cluster A exhibited significantly better overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those in Cluster B. Notable differences were observed in the mutation profiles of high-frequency genes such as TP53, KRAS and EGFR between the clusters. KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that the DEGs were primarily enriched in pathways such as "Cell cycle" and "Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction". GSEA indicated significant associations with gene sets related to the malignant progression of tumors. Drug sensitivity analysis demonstrated significant differences in IC50 values for the 10 drugs between the two clusters. A risk model based on 9 genes was successfully constructed. Patients in the high-risk group had a higher proportion of deaths and significantly lower survival probability (P<0.0001). The area under the curve (AUC) values for the model at 1, 3 and 5 years were 0.700, 0.647 and 0.675, respectively. Validation in the GSE31210 cohort confirmed the model's stability and generalizability. The expression of core genes differed significantly between risk groups (P<0.0001). High expression of HMGA1 and PLEK2 was associated with poor prognosis, whereas the expression of ID3 and DAPK2 showed no significant association with prognosis. Univariate Cox regression incorporating clinical variables and the LASSO risk score demonstrated that the risk score was significantly associated with OS (HR=0.49, P=3.80×10-6). After multivariate adjustment, the risk score remained an independent prognostic factor (HR=0.57, P=6.40×10-4), exhibiting stable independent predictive value. Analysis of public datasets and Western blot experiments confirmed that PLEK2 expression was upregulated in LUAD tissues and further elevated in EGFR-TKIs-resistant cell lines.

conclusionsThe risk model constructed in this study effectively predicts the prognosis of LUAD patients. PLEK2 is highly expressed in LUAD and associated with EGFR-TKIs resistance, suggesting its potential as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungDatabases, GeneticLung NeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPrognosisCluster analysisCore genesLung neoplasmsPrognosis predictionRisk model

Identifiers

PMID41500779
PMCPMC12782933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.