ArticleBMJ open2026
Is practice variation determined in the needs assessments performed by Dutch home care nurses? A cross-sectional multilevel analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing home care nursing in the Netherlands: how can organisations facilitate the improvement of needs assessments in home care nursing? A focus group study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWhile needs assessment is the starting point of good quality care, there is anecdotal evidence of patients receiving different care in similar circumstances. This study aims to investigate whether practice variation exists in needs assessments conducted by home care nurses and to identify the factors influencing these assessments.
designA cross-sectional, quantitative retrospective study.
settingPrimary care; home care nursing in the Netherlands in 2023.
participantsSampling was based on criterion sampling. Home care organisations were approached based on the following inclusion criteria: organisations providing home care nursing in the Netherlands, organisations from various regions of the country and organisations offering different types of home care nursing (eg, paediatric or palliative care), funded under the Dutch Health Insurance Act (Zvw). Organisations were excluded if they provided home care nursing funded by sources other than the Dutch Health Insurance Act. Home care nurses were recruited from participating organisations, each of whom had recently assessed the care needs of at least five patients. In total, 28 organisations and 258 home care nurses participated in this study, thereby yielding data from 1615 patients. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessed and delivered minutes of home care per patient per week.
resultsVariation was primarily associated with patient-related factors. After accounting for these factors, 83% (assessed minutes) and 88% (delivered minutes) of the total variation was attributed to the patient level, 8% (assessed minutes) and 10% (delivered minutes) to the home care nurses' level and 9% (assessed minutes) and 2% (delivered minutes) to the organisational level. Due to inadequate documentation in electronic health records, many missing values were identified.
conclusionsThe lack of nursing documentation suggests that missing factors may have contributed to variations in needs assessments. Thus, further research should comprehensively explore the patient-related factors currently absent from nursing documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.