ArticleBMJ open2026
Tobacco use in the context of natural disasters: a scoping review pertinent to tobacco control in Indonesia.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn Indonesia, the second most natural disaster-prone country in the world, the tobacco industry exploits such crises via corporate social responsibility. The objective of this study was to map existing evidence on natural disasters and tobacco use in order to understand how tobacco control policies could be optimised in disaster-prone regions.
designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: ScienceDirect, PubMed and Google Scholar, with searches conducted twice: between January and April 2024 and again in August 2025. STUDY SELECTION: All studies examining natural disasters, smoking behaviours and the tobacco industry. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were assessed primarily on reports of tobacco use change, tobacco control policy enforcement, tobacco industry interference and mention of the role of stress. Data on country, disaster type, type of research study and sample details were also collated.
results27 of the 611 identified studies were included in the final analysis. Two-thirds of studies reported an increase in smoking rates following disasters. No studies mentioned tobacco control policy enforcement or tobacco industry interference during disasters. Most of the studies (74%) which examined the relationship between disaster-related stress and smoking found a positive association. About half (51.9%) of the studies described disasters in the Americas.
conclusionsSmoking rates often rise after stress-inducing disasters. More evidence is urgently required to assist countries like Indonesia in enforcing tobacco control and preventing tobacco industry interference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.