ArticleBMJ open2026
Understanding the role of knowledge and attitudes of community pharmacy staff in non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing practices in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibiotic Use and Care-Seeking Practices for Childhood Diarrhea and Respiratory Illnesses in Community Settings in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Caregiver Survey.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical public health issue in Bangladesh, exacerbated by the widespread practice of non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing. This study seeks to assess their knowledge and attitudes, particularly how these factors influence non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing practices in Bangladesh.
methodsA total of 287 pharmacy staff across four regions of Bangladesh were included in the study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing.
resultsThe study found that 92.4% of respondents dispensed antibiotics without prescriptions. The practice was significantly more prevalent among those with poor knowledge (99.28% in below-average vs 86.09% in above-average knowledge groups, p<0.001) and negative attitudes (97.6% in below-average vs 88.41% in above-average attitude groups, p=0.004) regarding antibiotic use. Only 11.9% respondents understood antibiotics' ineffectiveness against viral infections and 47.0% were unaware of prescription requirements. While 93.0% recognised non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing as a risk of AMR, 65.9% cited profit concerns as a barrier to refusing non-prescribed sales. Multivariable analysis identified poor knowledge (adjusted OR 15.7, p=0.01) as a key predictor of inappropriate dispensing.
conclusionThese findings highlight knowledge and attitude towards antibiotic dispensing play a vital role where weak regulation, education and economic incentives further worsen the situation. Urgent interventions, including improved pharmacist training, prescription monitoring and public awareness campaigns, are essential to reduce non-prescribed antibiotic dispensing and align practices with Bangladesh's National Action Plan on AMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.