Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41500624›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2026

Understanding recruitment to a randomised controlled trial (RCT) during liver transplantation: an observational mixed-methods Study Within A Trial (SWAT).

Katherine Elizabeth Sarah Coppack, Ilya Kantsedikas, Edgar Brodkin, Ee Neng Loh, Gareth Ambler, Suneetha Ramani Moonesinghe, Jeremy Fabes, Vivienne Hannon, Michael Spiro, Duncan Wagstaff

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04941911 (A Double-blind Randomised Placebo-controlled Feasibility Study to Assess the Impact of Octreotide Infusion During Liver Transplantation on Post-operative Renal Failure.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04941911 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Double-blind Randomised Placebo-controlled Feasibility Study to Assess the Impact of Octreotide Infusion During Liver Transplantation on Post-operative Renal Failure.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2022 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsLiver Transplantation, Renal FailureArmsOctreotide Acetate, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katherine Elizabeth Sarah CoppackNorth Central and East London Rotation, NHS Health Education England London School of Anaesthesia, London, England, UK katherine.coppack@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2810-6427
Ilya KantsedikasNorth West London Rotation, NHS Health Education England London School of Anaesthesia, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-0674
Edgar BrodkinDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8764-0390
Ee Neng LohDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2012-5172
Gareth AmblerDepartment of Statistical Science and Joint Research Support Office, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5322-7327
Suneetha Ramani MoonesingheCentre for Perioperative Medicine, Division of Surgery and Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6730-5824
Jeremy FabesDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1111-5973
Vivienne HannonDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Michael SpiroDivision of Surgical Biotechnology, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3201-471X
Duncan WagstaffCentre for Perioperative Medicine, Division of Surgery and Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9472-1578

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPerioperative randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in liver transplantation are relatively infrequent. RCTs performed in this complex patient population need to be robustly conducted to maximise patient benefit and graft utility given the scarcity of donor organs. Recruitment challenges can compromise RCTs and studies in this population face unique challenges due to recipient illness severity, their comorbidities, demographics and the geographical constraints of specialist transplant centres. Emergency presentation and after-hours admission may further limit patients' capacity or readiness to consider trial participation. This Study Within a Trial (SWAT) specifically explored motivators and barriers to recruitment in patients awaiting liver transplantation.

designAn observational mixed-methods 'Study within a Trial', nested within a feasibility RCT.

settingThis study was dual centred at two Tertiary National Health Service Hospitals; The Royal Free Hospital, a liver transplant centre in North London and University Hospital Birmingham, a liver transplant centre in Birmingham.

participantsAdults who were eligible for liver transplantation and recruitment into the associated RCT were eligible for inclusion into the SWAT.

interventionsCompletion of an 18-question validated written questionnaire which explored motivation for accepting or declining participation in the RCT.

main outcome measuresThrough completion of the questionnaire, participants shared their perspectives on the RCT and their rationale for consenting or declining participation. Responses were analysed, providing feedback to the Trial Management Group (TMG) to refine recruitment strategies for future trials. An additional component, comprising interviews and audio recordings of recruitment consultations, was planned if the RCT recruitment rates fell below prespecified thresholds or concerns were raised by the RCT TMG, neither of which occurred.

results84 completed questionnaires were received. Motivators included patients believing that the trial will benefit others, interest in helping with research, perception that benefits outweigh risks and belief that it offered the best treatment. Barriers included concerns about randomisation, feeling overburdened and a perception of lack of support from family or friends.

conclusionThis is the first study exploring recruitment to a perioperative RCT involving patients undergoing liver transplantation. Key motivators were altruism and perceived safety, while barriers included concerns about randomisation and lack of family support. Future focus during recruitment should be on neutral patient-centred consultations, adequate information sharing, fostering of patient trust, improved explanation of randomisation and engagement of the patient's support network. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04941911 (Health Research Authority) and SWAT 152 (the Study With A Trial Database).

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationPatient SelectionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdultAgedClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSurveys and QuestionnairesPatient ParticipationQUALITATIVE RESEARCHRandomized Controlled TrialTRANSPLANT SURGERY

Identifiers

PMID41500624
PMCPMC12781991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.