Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41500561›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2026

Machine learning-based cardiovascular risk calculator for non-cardiac surgery.

Nour Al Khatib, Ali Chehab, Hani Tamim, Habib A Dakik, Razane Tajeddine

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nour Al KhatibDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, American University of Beirut Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4486-7191
Ali ChehabDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, American University of Beirut Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hani TamimInternal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Habib A DakikInternal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6436-600X
Razane TajeddineDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, American University of Beirut Maroun Semaan Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Beirut, Lebanon rstajeddine@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1381-7680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnnually, 4% of the global population undergoes non-cardiac surgery, with 30% of those patients having at least one cardiovascular risk factor. It is estimated that the 30-day mortality is between 0.5% and 2%.The main objective of this study is to develop a traditional machine learning (ML) model that provides a cardiovascular risk score for patients older than 50 years undergoing non-cardiac surgery, calculating the risk from the date of surgery until 30 days post surgery, with specific emphasis on interpretability and explainability of the model's decision-making process.

methodsThe NSQIP 2022 dataset was used to build the model. It consisted of a total of 4 97 011 patients after data cleaning. The primary clinical endpoint was death, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest or stroke at 30 days postoperatively, which occurred in 1.44% of the patients. Different preprocessing techniques were performed for data cleaning and feature selection. The cleaned data were then used to model the selected learning algorithms, including Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest and boosting Decision Tree algorithms (CatBoost, AdaBoost, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting). These models were evaluated in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and their corresponding 95% CI.

resultsFor classification, the trained models were evaluated using AUROC on the test set. LightGBM achieved the highest AUROC of 0.9009 with a 95% CI of 0.8889 to 0.9126. The model consisted of six data elements: type of surgery, American Society of Anesthesiology classification, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), sepsis, emergent surgery and mechanical ventilation.

conclusionIn our study, LightGBM classifier proved to be the best model for cardiovascular risk scoring, demonstrating a strong balance between prediction accuracy and generalisation.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical Procedures, OperativeAgedFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBiostatisticsMyocardial InfarctionRISK FACTORSSTROKE

Identifiers

PMID41500561
PMCPMC12781980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.