Trial reportBlood advances2026
Concizumab in hemophilia with inhibitors: longer-term efficacy and safety results from the phase 3 explorer7 study.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04083781 (Efficacy and Safety of Concizumab Prophylaxis in Patients With Haemophilia A or B With Inhibitors), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Concizumab Prophylaxis in Patients With Haemophilia A or B With Inhibitors
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractConcizumab is an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) monoclonal antibody intended for once-daily subcutaneous prophylactic treatment for people with hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors. Results from the phase 3 explorer7 study confirmed superiority of concizumab prophylaxis over no prophylaxis in reducing the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in people with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors (HAwI/HBwI). Male patients aged ≥12 years were randomized 1:2 to no prophylaxis (group 1) or concizumab prophylaxis (group 2), or nonrandomly allocated to concizumab prophylaxis (groups 3 and 4). After ≥24 weeks of treatment, patients in group 1 could switch to concizumab prophylaxis. At the 56-week cutoff (defined as when all patients in groups 2-4 had completed the visit at 56 weeks or permanently discontinued treatment), bleed-related efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and safety were assessed. Of the 133 patients enrolled (HAwI, n = 80; HBwI, n = 53), 114 received concizumab prophylaxis (groups 2-4) and 19 were randomized to no prophylaxis (group 1). After ≥24 weeks, 13 patients from group 1 switched to concizumab. Median ABR for treated spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes in patients receiving concizumab was 0.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.0-3.2) at the 56-week cutoff, consistent with the low bleeding rates (median ABR, 0.0; IQR, 0.0-3.3) at the 32-week cutoff. Concizumab and free-TFPI concentration remained stable over time. No new safety concerns were reported. Longer-term (≥1 year) efficacy and safety results of concizumab prophylaxis for HAwI/HBwI were consistent with the 32-week cutoff results in explorer7. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04083781.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.