ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Comparative Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Metronidazole, Chlorhexidine, and Normal Saline as Laser- and Sonic-Activated Intracanal Irrigants Against
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The persistence of Enterococcus faecalis is a significant challenge in endodontic therapy, due to its ability to form biofilms and penetrate the dentinal tubules, frequently leading to treatment failures. Therefore, despite the proven antimicrobial activity of metronidazole (MTR) and chlorhexidine (CHX), the resilience of E. faecalis necessitates integrating activation techniques. Laser and sonic activation methods show promise in enhancing the antibacterial performance of irrigants. However, studies on the activation-enhanced efficacy of MTR, CHX, and saline remain limited. Objective: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial efficacy of MTR, CHX, and normal saline as intracanal irrigants when activated by laser and sonic techniques against E. faecalis in extracted human mandibular premolars. Methods: It is a laboratory-based in vitro experimental study involving extracted human teeth. Ninety freshly extracted single-rooted mandibular premolars will be obtained, decoronated, and biomechanically prepared. Canals will be inoculated with E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) and incubated for 7 days to allow biofilm formation. The teeth will then be randomly divided into 3 main groups ([MTR], [CHX], and saline), each subdivided based on the activation method used (laser or sonic). Irrigation protocols will be standardized, and pre- and postirrigation bacterial samples will be collected on paper points and cultured on brain heart infusion agar. Colony-forming units will be counted to evaluate antibacterial efficacy. Results: As of June 2025, ethical approval for the study has been obtained. Sample collection of extracted human teeth commenced in July 2025, and 90 extracted teeth have been collected as of January 2026, corresponding to the planned sample size. Laboratory procedures and data analysis have not yet commenced. Conclusions: This study aims to provide evidence-based insights into optimizing root canal disinfection protocols by evaluating and comparing the synergistic effects of antimicrobial agents and advanced activation techniques. The findings could contribute significantly to improving endodontic treatment outcomes and reducing the incidence of persistent infections caused by E. faecalis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.