ArticlePloS one2026
Etiological factors of the risk for occupational illness in nursing professionals: An etiology and risk review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNursing professionals are inherently exposed to various risk factors, which may be exacerbated depending on the conditions under which care is provided. For instance, many healthcare institutions are considered hazardous environments for admitting patients with diverse diseases and performing procedures that carry potential risks of accidents and occupational diseases with them.
objectiveTo identify the etiological factors associated with the Risk for Occupational Illness Nursing diagnosis in Nursing professionals.
methodsAn Etiology and Risk Review Protocol was developed following the guidelines outlined in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under number CRD42024549181.
resultsThe findings of this review will be publicly disseminated through scientific journals in health sciences, contributing to enhancing the evidence base corresponding to the Risk for Occupational Illness Nursing diagnosis. This will support its inclusion in future NANDA International editions, ensuring that the diagnosis remains current and aligned with the latest scientific literature.
conclusionIt is anticipated that the review will generate evidence addressing stages 3, 4, 7, and 8 of the concept analysis for the Risk for Occupational Illness diagnosis, specifically: Identifying possible uses of the concept; Determining critical defining attributes; Identifying antecedents and consequences; and Defining empirical referents. DESCRIPTORS: Occupational stress; Occupational diseases; Etiology; Nursing diagnosis; Nursing professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.