ArticlePloS one2026
Structural engineering, BSA binding and computational analysis of isonipacotate based enzyme inhibitors containing 1,2,4-triazole.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synthetic chemistry facing little difficulties in C-C, C-S, and C-N double bonds activation is a very long-standing challenge. The current studies based on the development of C-N double and single bond, N-N bond and C-S in the trizole and azinane merged rings into single unit. The targeted compounds were obtained through metal free, microwave assisted and conventional techniques. The present work covers sulfonamide, hydrazide synthesis, 1,2,4-triazole, and thioether synthesis to produce piperidine-based triazole analogues (7a-j). An array of electrophiles (6a-j) was treated with 1,2,4-triazole (5) under conventional (59-72% yield) and microwave assisted (87-95% yield) protocols to acquire the targeted molecules (7a-j). The proton and carbon NMR, and IR techniques were used for structural characterization. The analogues (7a-j) were screened against BChE, α-Glucosidase, 15-LOX, and AChE in search for leads compounds. The most active analogues found through IC50 values in μM against AChE were 7h (1.29 ± 1.24), 7c (2.58 ± 1.32) and 7i (5.62 ± 1.35) compared with the standard eserine (0.19 ± 0.05). Compound 7i (2.24 ± 1.80) of the synthesized analogue was found most active against BChE. Compounds against 15-LOX were 7i (2.07 ± 1.17) and 7e (2.12 ± 0.37) found even better than the standard quercetin (2.34 ± 0.35). Most of the synthesized analogues (7a, 7d-7j) showed very excellent potential strength against α-Glucosidase even efficient than reference drug acarbose (38.25 ± 0.12) presented in Table 3. The in vitro results were confirmed by molecular docking investigations of the active ligands with the targeted enzymes. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) binding studies displayed how the ligands interacted with BSA. The data altogether predicts these molecules as leads in search for cholinesterase (7h, 7c, 7i) and 15-LOX (7i) enzymes. Further in vivo work is continued on targeted derivatives of 1,2,4- triazoles as inhibitors of therapeutically important enzymes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.