Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41499582›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

Comparative efficacy of schroth and core training for early postoperative recovery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A single blind randomized controlled trial.

Fanyuan Meng, Kerong Li, Wei Wang, Rui Yang, Cong Wang, Zhi Zhao, Moxian Chen, Lijuan Ao

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fanyuan MengSchool of Rehabilitation, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1146-3833
Kerong LiSchool of Rehabilitation, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Wei WangCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Rui YangSchool of Rehabilitation, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Cong WangSchool of Rehabilitation, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Zhi ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Moxian ChenSchool of Rehabilitation, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Lijuan AoSchool of Rehabilitation, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of Schroth exercises combined with core training versus core training alone on early trunk balance optimization and functional recovery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients following selective thoracic fusion surgery.

methodsThis single-blinded randomized controlled trial enrolled 46 AIS patients with Lenke1 type configuration who underwent selective thoracic posterior spinal fusion at the Orthopedics Department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. Participants were randomly assigned to either the Schroth exercise combined Core Training (SCT, n = 23) or Core training group (CT, n = 23). The SCT group received Schroth three-dimensional (3D) scoliosis-specific exercises combined with core stabilization training: during the initial 3 postoperative months, they performed core exercises, rotational angular breathing, and daily postural management; during the subsequent 3 months, they engaged in Schroth 3D corrective exercises targeting surgical correction outcomes. The CT group exclusively performed core stabilization training throughout the 6-month postoperative period. Both groups received 40-minute intervention sessions three to four times weekly from discharge to 6 months postoperatively. Assessments were conducted at four time points: preoperatively, at the discharge (postoperative day 7), and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Spinal radiographic parameters, paraspinal muscle surface electromyography, core muscle strength and endurance, and SRS-22 questionnaire data were analyzed to evaluate early clinical efficacy across three domains: body structure/function, activities, and participation in surgically treated AIS patients.

resultsAnalysis of the primary radiographic outcomes revealed no significant time-by-group interactions. However, the SCT group demonstrated superior overall improvement in pelvic balance compared to the CT group (Group main effect: p = 0.032). For secondary exploratory outcomes, significant interactions were observed for trunk extensor endurance and SRS-22 self-image (p < 0.01), with the SCT group showing greater improvement than the CT group specifically at the 6-month follow-up (p < 0.05). In unadjusted exploratory comparisons, trunk flexor endurance was also better in the SCT group at 6 months (p = 0.046). No other significant between-group differences were found.

conclusionCompared with isolated core stabilization training, Schroth 3D scoliosis-specific exercises combined with core training demonstrate superior efficacy in improving early postoperative muscular function, pelvic symmetry, and self-image. Nevertheless, comparable effects were observed between both rehabilitation protocols regarding early postoperative Cobb angles of major and minor curves, convex-concave paraspinal muscle balance restoration, pain alleviation, and psychological status improvement.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyScoliosisAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleMuscle StrengthPostoperative PeriodPostural BalanceRecovery of FunctionSingle-Blind MethodSpinal FusionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41499582
PMCPMC12779134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.