ArticlePloS one2026
Enhancing quality and decision-making for care pathways: An application of process mining in cancer care.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Care pathways are widely used as evidence-based clinical governance tools to enhance the quality of care of groups of patients with a specific clinical problem and optimize the use of resources. However, it is often the case that there are differences between the recommended care pathway and the actual clinical practice. Recently, Process Mining (PM) techniques, a family of data-driven techniques from computer science that uses logs (execution traces) of a system to reason about its underlying process, have been applied in the healthcare context to map and analyze real-world practice patterns. In particular, PM helps to discover and analyze the sequence of activities, to highlight variances and possible sub-optimal management of the clinical paths in order to improve care quality and reduce the inefficient allocation of resources. Using the breast cancer pathway as a case study example, this study aims to describe the application of PM to administrative healthcare data of public hospitals of the Tuscany Region (Italy) and to offer insights about strengths and limitations in data management, information creation, and interpretation to support decision-making. The study revealed variations in the management of breast cancer care pathways across different public healthcare providers and with respect to the recommended guidelines. Key findings include instances of service duplication, delays, and bottlenecks, particularly in the diagnostic phase. The analysis also highlighted variations in healthcare costs, driven by differences in the frequency and types of diagnostic exams or visits performed. The findings have practical implications for enhancing the efficiency and quality of breast cancer care and provide a practical example of how the methodology can be applied to other healthcare contexts for similar benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.