ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model based on liver CSE-MRI fat maps for predicting dyslipidemia.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) model for the non-invasive early detection of dyslipidemia using liver chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) fat maps. An automated AI pipeline was developed to predict abnormalities in four lipid indicators: triglyceride, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The study utilized 1,757 liver CSE-MRI fat images from 89 patients who underwent MRI scans and contemporaneous blood lipid testing. Transfer learning was applied using several pre-trained networks, including ResNet18, MobileNet, DenseNet, AlexNet, and SqueezeNet. Model performance was evaluated via 8-fold cross-validation, with the optimal model further assessed on a held-out test set using confusion matrices and derived metrics. Significant performance differences were observed among models. The optimal model, based on ResNet18, demonstrated high accuracy in the internal validation set. On the independent test set, this model achieved accuracies of 0.853 for triglyceride, 0.833 for total cholesterol, 0.937 for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and 0.936 for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, with corresponding F1-Scores of 0.885, 0.571, 0.886, and 0.897. The AI model based on liver CSE-MRI fat maps shows high accuracy and generalization in predicting abnormalities for three key lipid indices, validating its potential as an early warning tool for dyslipidemia. Expanding the training dataset could further enhance performance for all lipid indices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.