ArticlePloS one2026
Unbiased inference for echocardiogram urgency prediction using double machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increased utilization of echocardiography in clinical practice has witnessed a substantial rise, underscoring its pivotal role as a diagnostic tool for various cardiovascular conditions. However, due to the relative scarcity of echocardiography tests, challenges persist in efficiently prioritizing patients for echocardiographic assessments. In this study, we develop a model to assess the urgency of appointments by considering both clinical and administrative variables extracted from Electronic Health Record data. We use double machine learning techniques to analyze these variables and improve our predictions of patient urgency. Traditional methods for estimating variable effects have limitations, particularly in our research context, where clinical and administrative variables may influence one another while also directly impacting the outcome (i.e., the urgency of appointments). In this work, we address this issue by developing an urgency stratification model using double machine learning, which disentangles the complex relationships between variables. Our evaluations demonstrate that the proposed model not only outperforms traditional machine learning methods in predicting appointment urgency but also provides robust estimations of variable effects. Specifically, our results underscore the critical roles of administrative variables and cancer-related comorbidity variables in patient prioritization and appointment urgency prediction. By leveraging double machine learning techniques, our method can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of echocardiography utilization in clinical practice. It provides clinicians with actionable insights for patient prioritization, facilitating the timely identification of urgent cases and the optimal allocation of resources. Our work contributes to the advancement of healthcare practices by leveraging sophisticated analytics to improve patient care delivery and streamline clinical workflows in echocardiography laboratories. A similar research design can also be extended to other advanced yet limited laboratory tests to help prioritize medical resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.