ArticlePloS one2026
Machine learning-based prediction of the axial load capacity of UHPC strengthened reinforced concrete columns: A comparative analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Constituent-Material-Anchored Continual Learning for Full Stress-Strain Prediction of Multi-Material PETG/PC-ABS MEX Laminates.Polymers · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning with Bayesian optimization for bond strength prediction of steel reinforcement in geopolymer concrete.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study develops and evaluates machine learning (ML) models to predict the axial load capacity (Pu) of reinforced concrete (RC) columns strengthened with ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) jackets. A comprehensive experimental database containing 105 test samples with 17 key input parameters was compiled from the literature, representing the most extensive dataset of UHPC-jacketed RC columns to date. Using this database, a machine learning (ML) framework was established to predict the ultimate axial load capacity, employing six models: Extremely Randomized Trees (ER) model, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Xgboost, CatBoost, and Cascade Forward Neural Networks (CFNNs). The CatBoost model achieved the best performance with R² = 0.983, MAE = 177 kN, and RMSE = 211 kN, significantly outperforming traditional design codes such as ACI 318 and EC2. In addition to high predictive accuracy, SHAP analysis was conducted to interpret the influence of each parameter, providing new insights into the mechanical behavior and governing factors of UHPC-jacketed RC columns. These findings highlight the capability of advanced ML to capture complex nonlinear effects more effectively than traditional methods. The proposed framework not only provides new insights into the mechanics of UHPC-RC columns but also offers a reliable predictive tool to support safer and more efficient design for strengthening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.