ArticlePloS one2026
Long-term preservation of bacteria in washed sterile sand: A 14-year study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbial biobanking: safeguarding the tiny treasures for sustainable human welfare.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCryopreservation and lyophilization are standard methods for preserving microbial cultures, but they are expensive and labor-intensive, creating a barrier for resource-constrained laboratories. This study evaluated the efficacy of a simple and inexpensive alternative: long-term storage in washed and sterilized sand.
methodsFourteen bacterial strains from ten genera were preserved in sealed tubes containing washed and sterilized sand at room temperature. Viability, assessed by colony-forming units (CFU/g), was quantified at inoculation and after 7 and 14 years. Phenotypic stability was evaluated by comparing the pre- and post-storage profiles for enzyme activity and stress tolerance.
resultsAfter seven years, all 14 strains remained culturable with preserved phenotypic features. After 14 years, 13 strains (93%) were viable. The highest recovery rates were observed in spore-forming Gram-positive bacteria (e.g., Bacillus sp.), indicating taxon-specific survival. Notably, the Gram-negative strain Enterobacter hormaechei remained stable with only a approximate 1.58 log₁₀ reduction over 14 years (half-life = 2.67 years). All resuscitated strains maintained their pre-storage characteristics. The distinct survival patterns for each species indicate that contamination was not the primary driver of the outcomes.
conclusionWashed and sterile sand offers a practical, low-energy matrix for long-term preservation of a diverse range of bacteria, effectively maintaining cultivability and key phenotypic attributes for over a decade. This approach is an economical preservation strategy for resource-limited laboratories and field collections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.