Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41499367›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational science2026

Analysis of Current Industry Practices for Informing Dosing Recommendation for Patients With Renal Impairment.

Noah Christopher Frazier, Islam Younis, Ashish Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noah Christopher FrazierBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-6548-3399
Islam YounisQuantitative Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9000-0431
Ashish SharmaBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2236-3032

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent updates in clinical guidelines and health authority guidance documents have aimed to standardize best practices for assessing renal function; however, it remains unclear whether the pharmaceutical industry has fully adopted these recommendations. This analysis aims to describe the current methodologies used to evaluate the impact of renal impairment (RI) on drug exposure and to inform dosing recommendations for patients with RI, providing insight into current industry practices and identifying potential areas for improvement. A list of new molecular entities (NMEs) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between 2018 and 2024 was compiled, and the clinical development strategies for assessing the impact of RI on the pharmacokinetics and safety of these NMEs were reviewed. We reviewed 192 NMEs. In dedicated renal impairment studies, renal function was assessed by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in 60 studies, measured GFR in 1 study, and creatinine clearance in 31 studies. We also found that 6 NMEs-5 out of 162 NMEs with non-substantial renal excretion (RE) and 1 out of 30 NMEs with substantial RE required an actionable dosing recommendation for patients with mild RI. In contrast, for severe RI, we found that 47 NMEs-30 out of 162 NMEs with non-substantial RE and 17 out of 30 NMEs with substantial RE required an actionable dosing recommendation. The findings suggest that excluding mild RI patients from phase 2 and 3 studies is not required and highlight that industry must continue efforts to harmonize drug development with clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

Drug IndustryRenal InsufficiencyDose-Response Relationship, DrugGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidneyKidney Function TestsPractice Guidelines as TopicUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administrationdoseexposure responserenalsafety

Identifiers

PMID41499367
PMCPMC12778405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.