SynthesisOphthalmic research2026
Efficacy of Faricimab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Single-Arm Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Ophthalmic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNeovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a leading cause of vision loss and requires long-term anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of faricimab in patients with nAMD.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies assessing faricimab in nAMD. Primary outcomes included visual acuity, central macular thickness (CMT), and dry macula rate. Secondary outcomes included macular status, central choroidal thickness (CCT), and complications. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled mean with 95% confidence intervals.
resultsOut of the 365 studies identified, 21 studies were included, comprising a total sample size of 1,864 eyes of 1,791 patients. Post-operatively, there was a statistically significant improvement in corrected distance visual acuity (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.122, 95% p = 0.039) and CMT (SMD: -3.672, p = 0.010). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in the rate of dry macula at the final follow-up visit (event rate: 0.529; p < 0.05). For the secondary outcomes, there was a statistically significant improvement in CCT (SMD: -0.199, p = 0.026) and in the rate of macular exudates (0.452, p < 0.05), specifically intraretinal fluid (0.140, p < 0.05) and subretinal fluid (0.271, p < 0.05). Complications secondary to faricimab injections included hemorrhagic pigment epithelial detachment with a rate of 0.120 (p < 0.05) and retinal pigment epithelium tear with a rate of 0.025 (p < 0.05).
conclusionsThe use of faricimab injection in patients with nAMD is safe and effective, resulting in significant improvements in a myriad of visual measures and OCT parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.