ArticlePhysical therapy2026
"It's an Uncomfortable Subject"-a Qualitative Exploration of the Challenges and Potential Solutions to Depression Screening in Low Back Pain.
Article in Physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceComorbid depression in people with low back pain (LBP) is associated with poorer prognosis.
objectiveThe objective was to understand the challenges faced by musculoskeletal (MSK) triage physical therapists when screening for depression in LBP populations, and to generate actionable recommendations for overcoming these challenges.
designThis study adopted a pragmatic hybrid descriptive qualitative approach, integrating elements of ethnography and action research.
settingInterviews were conducted in the Republic of Ireland and used purposive sampling of physical therapists working in MSK triage roles.
participantsTo be included, participants were required to have managed at least 1 person with LBP each week in the 3 months prior to recruitment. INTERVENTION(S) OR EXPOSURE(S): The context explored was MSK triage physical therapists' experience with depression screening in people with LBP. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURE(S): The main outcomes were insights regarding challenges and potential solutions to depression screening. Semi-structured interviews were employed, with data analysis following a Reflexive Thematic Analysis framework.
resultsFourteen MSK triage physical therapists participated. Challenges were organized into 3 themes: capacity (personal, professional, and system), culture (clinic, societal), and circuitous communication. Potential solutions were organized into 5 themes: training and education, standardized pathways, knowledge of and access to resources, screening tools, and normalizing depression screening in MSK triage equivalent to red flag screening.
conclusionThe findings highlight capacity and cultural challenges that lead to circuitous communication. Addressing the potential solutions through implementation research could enhance depression screening practices by MSK triage physical therapists for people with LBP. RELEVANCE: This qualitative research offers novel insights into the challenges MSK triage physical therapists face when screening for depression in people with LBP. Importantly, it proposes actionable solutions with participants contributing as subject matter experts. Their pragmatic solutions can help facilitate consequential change and help normalize depression screening in MSK triage practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.