Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41499118›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

National Compliance With Community Input on Nonprofit Hospital Community Benefit Activities.

Ashlyn Burns, Brian Kim, Cory Cronin, Harper He, Tatiane Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashlyn BurnsDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Brian KimHeritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens.
Cory CroninCollege of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens.
Harper HeCelia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Tatiane SantosCelia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Funding

AHRQ HHS K01 HS029701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In exchange for tax exemptions valued at $37.4 billion, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires all nonprofit hospitals to conduct a triennial community health needs assessment (CHNA) and develop an implementation strategy (IS). As part of these community benefit (CB) activities, hospitals must solicit and account for input from the community in the form of written comments, which may improve hospital investments in population health. Objective: To examine nonprofit hospital compliance with the community input requirement and the approaches hospitals have used to solicit and account for written comments from the community. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from CHNAs and ISs completed by nonprofit hospitals between 2018 and 2021. CHNAs and ISs were downloaded from hospital websites in 2022. A 20% stratified random sample was drawn from all 3087 US nonprofit hospitals. Data extraction and content analysis was performed from July 2024 to March 2025, and statistical analysis was performed from March to June 2025. Exposure: ACA community input requirement in CB activities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospitals were considered compliant with the community input requirement if they described the following in their CHNA or IS: (1) how written comments on the most recent CHNA and/or IS were solicited, (2) at least 1 written comment received, and (3) how this information was taken into account in the current CHNA and/or IS. Bivariate analyses using χ2 tests to compare the organizational characteristics of compliant vs noncompliant hospitals. Results: The final study sample included 543 nonprofit hospitals, and 57 hospitals (10.5%) were compliant with the community input requirement. Among compliant hospitals, 27 (47.4%) used paper surveys, 20 (35.1%) used web-based surveys, 13 (22.8%) used in-person surveys at community outreach events, and 2 (3.5%) used telephone-based surveys to solicit community input. None of the characteristics assessed in the bivariate analysis were significantly different between compliant vs noncompliant hospitals. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of nonprofit hospitals found low hospital compliance with the Internal Revenue Service community input requirement in CB documents. This finding raises questions about whether the needs and strategies identified and addressed through CB activities reflect community priorities. To ensure that CB activities address community needs as intended under the ACA, policy changes are needed to improve nonprofit hospital compliance, transparency, and accountability.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationGuideline AdherenceHospitals, VoluntaryNeeds AssessmentOrganizations, NonprofitTax ExemptionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41499118
PMCPMC12780923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.