ReviewStress biology2026
Advances in genetic and molecular mechanisms of crop resistance to stalk rot.
Review in Stress biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction: Advances in genetic and molecular mechanisms of crop resistance to stalk rot.Stress biology · 2026Article
- FgMob1 is involved in mitotic exit and regulates the development, abiotic stress response, and pathogenicity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the global warming intensifies, along with increased planting density and straw retention practices, stalk rot (SR) has become one of major diseases that negatively impacts crop yield and quality. The distribution of SR pathogens, encompassing both fungal and bacterial agents, is significantly influenced by climate and agricultural factors. Although significant researches have been conducted on identifying fungal SR in different crop plants, there remains a lack of comprehensive reviews focused on the genetic and molecular mechanisms that contribute to crop resistance against fungal and bacterial SR. This review provides a comprehensive comparison of the pathogenic mechanisms associated with fungal and bacterial SR. It emphasized recently cloned genes and molecular regulations linked to resistance against SR, highlighted the pivotal role of several smart strategies in advancing gene discovery and functional research. Furthermore, it summarized the potential molecular regulatory pathways involved in SR resistance. Ultimately, the article presents insights into several critical areas that warrant further investigation in the study of SR-resistant mechanisms and crop breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.