Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41499073›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2026

Disconnect To Reconnect: How Variations between Types of Smartphone Bans Influence Students' Well-being and Social Connectedness in Dutch Secondary Education.

Elien Vanluydt, Regina van den Eijnden, Lisanne Vonk, Polina Putrik, Thérèse van Amelsvoort, Philippe Delespaul, Mark Levels, Tim Huijts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elien VanluydtResearch Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA), School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, the Netherlands. elien.vanluydt@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8753-9863
Regina van den EijndenInterdisciplinary Social Science, University Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 8, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lisanne VonkExpertise group Child Health, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Sylviusweg 71, 2333 BE, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Polina PutrikDepartment of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Thérèse van AmelsvoortDepartment of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Philippe DelespaulDepartment of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Institute, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Mark LevelsResearch Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA), School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, the Netherlands.
Tim HuijtsResearch Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA), School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200 MD, the Netherlands.

Funding

Nationaal Regieorgaan Onderwijsonderzoek 40.5.21325.004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartphone bans are gaining popularity in education, with approximately 40% of countries currently implementing such policies. Some schools apply smartphone restrictions to the classroom only (partial bans), while others extend the restrictions to the whole school grounds (full bans), hoping to foster student well-being and strengthen social connectedness at school. However, there is currently no empirical evidence that stricter policies are more effective in achieving these intended benefits. The current study examined how variations in type of ban affect adolescents’ screentime, problematic social media use, well-being, social connectedness at school, and bullying. The sample consisted of Dutch adolescents from 24 schools (9 partial-ban schools and 15 full-ban schools) who participated in the 2024–2025 EPoSS Study (N = 1398; Mage = 16.2; SD = 1.2; 51.5% were female; 38.3% were in partial-ban schools and 61.7% in full-ban schools). No significant differences were found for any of the well-being or bullying outcomes. However, full bans were associated with lower student-teacher connectedness and, for girls, reduced school belonging. These findings indicate that stricter bans do not yield the intended benefits for students’ well-being or bullying and may even undermine students’ social connectedness at school.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorSchoolsSmartphoneStudentsAdolescentBullyingFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsPsychological Well-BeingSocial MediaBullyingProblematic smartphone useSmartphone ban policiesSocial connectednessWell-being

Identifiers

PMID41499073
PMCPMC12966246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.