Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41499037›Full record

ArticleScience and engineering ethics2026

Space Research Ethics.

Oskari Sivula, Mikko Puumala, Minna Palmroth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oskari SivulaDepartment of Philosophy, Contemporary History and Political Science, University of Turku, Assistentinkatu 7, Turku, 20014, Finland. oskari.a.sivula@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-5223
Mikko PuumalaDepartment of Philosophy, Contemporary History and Political Science, University of Turku, Assistentinkatu 7, Turku, 20014, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5991-1798
Minna PalmrothDepartment of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 000014, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-1227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we characterise the field of space research ethics and the moral and political landscape it operates on. To lay the groundwork for our ethical analysis, we begin by introducing the diverse ways space research is conducted in practice and by discussing ongoing changes in its operational environment. We note that space research is necessary to facilitate our modern way of life and is integral to green and digital transformation. Following that, we identify key space research ethical issues in different domains and suggest tentative elements that trigger the need for research to undergo ethical review, to forward discussion and debate. The difficulty is to find suitable guidelines that are defined clearly enough to be action-guiding but simultaneously broad enough to address the complexity and global nature of space research. In the long term, the most feasible approach may be to define a tailored set of research ethical guidelines for particular fields, particular space environments, and particular research goals. We further address how the collective and global nature of space activities adds additional layers of challenges regarding the research ethical responsibility of the scientific community. In this context, we suggest that research ethics is not only a set of specific moral codes developed as a professional ethic for researchers, but also an institutionalised way to guide and support research activities and the integrity of researchers to maintain trust within the research community and the society at large.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchExtraterrestrial EnvironmentSpace FlightCodes of EthicsGuidelines as TopicHumansResearch PersonnelSocial ResponsibilityTrustEthical reviewResearch ethicsSpace ethicsSpace governanceSpace scienceSustainability

Identifiers

PMID41499037
PMCPMC12827399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.