ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Decoding Temporomandibular Disorders: Identifying Stage-Specific and Functional Patterns in the Articular Disc.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite affecting approximately 30% of the population, the pathogenesis of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) remains poorly understood. Conditions such as disc displacement and joint degeneration are often associated with biomechanical dysfunction. Identifying and categorizing biomarkers in the articular disc may enhance our understanding of disease mechanisms and progression, potentially improving diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic outcomes.
aimThis review examines patterns among immunohistochemical biomarkers in the articular disc, with a focus on internal derangement and disc displacement. It also explores associations with clinical, radiological, and histological findings, defining the functional and stage-specific relevance of each marker.
methodsA systematic search of major databases and journals identified studies that used immunohistochemical methods and included control groups. Biomarker patterns were analyzed in isolation and in relation to clinical, radiological, and histological findings. Patient demographics were examined to determine their alignment with disease trends. Study selection followed PRISMA guidelines; bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
resultsThe review included 511 patients (579 samples) and 132 controls (158 samples). Analysis identified 24 biomarkers, providing valuable insights into their role in inflammatory progression, ECM remodeling, and tissue degeneration. Biomarkers were classified according to functional and stage-specific patterns, facilitating early detection, refining disease staging, and supporting individualized treatment strategies.
conclusionDisc biopsy offers unique insights into the joint- and disc-specific mechanisms that drive TMD progression from disc displacement to degenerative findings. However, its clinical use remains limited by its invasive nature, ethical constraints, and the lack of standardized protocols for reliable study design and validated biomarker profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41499023What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.