Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41498986›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2026

[Post-Resuscitation care in the intensive care unit].

Sebastian Wolfrum, Tobias Wengenmayer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sebastian WolfrumInterdisziplinäre Notaufnahme, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Tobias WengenmayerInterdisziplinäre Medizinische Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinik der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland. tobias.wengenmayer@uniklinik-freiburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite major advances, morbidity and mortality after cardiac arrest remain high. Postresuscitation care requires a multimodal, time-coordinated approach. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) model describes four phases of brain injury, explaining the failure of single-target therapies. Cardiac arrest centers consolidate expertise and improve survival and neurological outcomes in observational studies, although randomized trials remain inconclusive. Hypoxia must be avoided, while hyperoxia should not be pursued; a MAP of 60-65 mm Hg is adequate. Immediate PCI is mandatory in STEMI but not without ST-elevation. ECPR may benefit selected patients if implemented early. Temperature management now focuses on fever prevention. Prognostication must be multimodal and appropriately timed to avoid premature withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationCritical CareHeart ArrestIntensive Care UnitsCombined Modality TherapyHumansHypothermia, InducedIntersectoral CollaborationPrognosisCardiac arrestFunctional statusPrognosisResuscitationTargeted temperature management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.