Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41498979›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[New antimicrobial substances to combat increasing resistance].

Jasmin Tischer, Nadine Dietze, Kathrin Marx, Henning Trawinski, Christoph Lübbert

Erratum issuedAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2026
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jasmin TischerBereich Infektiologie und Tropenmedizin, Medizinische Klinik I (Hämatologie, Zelltherapie, Hämostaseologie und Infektiologie), Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Nadine DietzeInstitut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Virologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Kathrin MarxKlinikapotheke, Klinikum St. Georg gGmbH, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Henning TrawinskiBereich Infektiologie und Tropenmedizin, Medizinische Klinik I (Hämatologie, Zelltherapie, Hämostaseologie und Infektiologie), Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Christoph LübbertBereich Infektiologie und Tropenmedizin, Medizinische Klinik I (Hämatologie, Zelltherapie, Hämostaseologie und Infektiologie), Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. christoph.luebbert@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the greatest threats to global health. In 2021, 4.71 million deaths worldwide were closely associated with AMR, and 1.14 million deaths could be directly attributed to infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), particularly multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDRGN). Enterobacterales (e.g., Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp.) resistant to third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) have been identified by the World Health Organization as the most problematic pathogens. In addition to new diagnostic methods for the rapid identification of AMR, several new antibiotics have been approved in the last 10 years, expanding the treatment options, particularly for MDRGN infections. Pharmaceutical strategies have so far focused primarily on modifying already known classes of antibiotics with the aim of circumventing class-specific resistance mechanisms and reducing resistance rates. In addition to cefiderocol, the first siderophore cephalosporin, new combinations of β‑lactam antibiotics and β‑lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) such as ceftolozan/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and meropenem/vaborbactam, as well as the monobactam/BLI combination aztreonam/avibactam, have been approved and successfully implemented in clinical care. In addition, there is the synthetic tetracycline antibiotic eravacycline, which has a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative (particularly clinically relevant Enterobacterales), anaerobic, and multidrug-resistant bacteria, and the new glycopeptide antibiotic dalbavancin, which is effective against Gram-positive bacteria. Since a change in legislation in 2021, the Joint Federal Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G‑BA) in Germany has been authorized to classify newly approved antibiotics as reserve antibiotics. This classification allows for an exception to the regular additional benefit assessment as part of the early benefit assessment. The pipeline of antibiotics in development with novel targets and chemical structures-which had almost completely dried up-has been re-filled with new candidates for clinical trials. Some of these agents have already been tested with promising results in smaller phase 1/2 studies. In addition, monoclonal antibodies, antimicrobial peptides, small molecules, microbiome-modifying biotherapeutics, and bacteriophages, all enabling targeted and personalized treatment, are currently being investigated in studies.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsDrug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterialbeta-Lactamase InhibitorsCephalosporinsGram-Negative BacteriaHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase InhibitorsCephalosporinsAntimicrobial resistanceAztreonam/avibactamCefiderocolCeftazidime/avibactamMultidrug resistance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.