ArticleBiological cybernetics2026
Task success in trained spiking neural network models coincides with emergence of cross-stimulus-modulated inhibition.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The neocortex is composed of spiking neurons interconnected in a sparse, recurrent network. Spiking activity within these networks underlies the computations that transform sensory inputs into appropriate behavioral responses. In this study, we train recurrent spiking neural network (SNN) models constrained by neocortical connectivity statistics and investigate the architectural changes that enable task-relevant, spike-based computations. We employ a binary state change detection task-an experimental paradigm used in animal behavioral studies. Our SNNs consist of interconnected excitatory and inhibitory units with connection probabilities and strengths modeled after the mouse neocortex and maintained throughout training and evaluation. Following training, we find that SNNs selectively modulate firing rates based on the binary input state, and that excitatory and inhibitory connectivity within and between input and recurrent layers adjusts accordingly. Notably, inhibitory neurons in the recurrent layer that positively modulate firing rates in response to one input state strengthen their connections to recurrent units with the opposite modulation. This push-pull connectivity-where excitation and inhibition are dynamically balanced in an opponent fashion-emerges as a key computational strategy and is reminiscent of connectivity observed in primary visual cortex. Using a one-hot output encoding yields identical firing rates to both input states, yet the push-pull inhibitory motif still arises. Importantly, this motif fails to emerge when Dale's principle is not enforced during training, and task performance also declines.Furthermore, disrupting spike timing by a few milliseconds significantly impairs task performance, highlighting the importance of precise spike time coordination for computation in sparse networks like neocortex. The emergence of push-pull inhibition through task training in spiking models underscores the crucial role of interneurons and structured inhibition in shaping neural dynamics and spike-based information processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.