Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41498949›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026

Role of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in arthroplasty and orthopaedics: a review of biomechanical properties, surface modifications, and clinical outcomes.

Raju Vaishya, Abhishek Vaish, Akash Dubey, Karthik Vishwanathan, Abid Haleem, Mohd Javaid, Filippo Migliorini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raju VaishyaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Abhishek VaishDepartment of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Akash DubeyDepartment of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Karthik VishwanathanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Smt B. K. Shah Medical Institute & Research Centre, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Vadodara, India.
Abid HaleemDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.
Mohd JavaidDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.
Filippo MiglioriniDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany. filippo.migliorini@uk-halle.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolyetheretherketone (PEEK) has gained attention as an alternative to metallic implants in orthopaedic applications, including arthroplasty, due to its mechanical properties and biocompatibility. This review evaluates the role of PEEK in arthroplasty and other orthopaedic applications by analysing its biomechanical characteristics, surface modifications, and clinical outcomes

methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Scopus, and Embase. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, preclinical research, and systematic reviews.

resultsPEEK's elastic modulus (3-4 GPa) closely matches that of human cortical bone, potentially reducing stress shielding and enhancing osseointegration. Its inherent radiolucency improves imaging capabilities, while various surface modification techniques, including hydroxyapatite coatings and nanopatterning, have been developed to enhance bone integration. Despite positive preclinical outcomes, clinical studies are predominantly focused on short- to mid-term results, with limited long-term data on implant survivorship and complications.

conclusionsWhile PEEK shows promise in orthopaedic applications, further research is necessary to establish its clinical efficacy relative to traditional metals. Addressing the current gaps in long-term studies, regulatory challenges, and manufacturing processes will be crucial for the broader adoption of PEEK implants in orthopaedic surgery. This review highlights the ongoing evolution of PEEK in the field and suggests directions for future research.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyBiocompatible MaterialsKetonesPolyethylene GlycolsBenzophenonesBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansOsseointegrationPolyether CompoundsPolymersSurface PropertiesBenzophenonesBiocompatible MaterialsKetonesPolyether CompoundspolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersBiomaterialsJoint replacementLong-term outcomesOsteointegrationRadiolucent implantsStress shieldingSurface modification

Identifiers

PMID41498949
PMCPMC12779741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.