Trial reportClinical oral investigations2026
Effect of deep margin elevation with different injectable materials on performance of CAD/CAM-Fabricated nanoceramic-resin onlays: 3-year randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Polymer-based restorative outcomes following deep margin elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The Perio-Resto Interface: In Vitro Comparison of Two Deep Margin Elevation Techniques on Surface Roughness, Marginal Adaptation and Material Integrity.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of deep margin elevation (DME) with four different injectable restorative materials on the three-year clinical performance of nanoceramic-resin CAD/CAM onlay restorations. MATERIALS AND
methodsSixty-four adult patients with subgingival, broad Class II carious molars indicated for onlay restorations were randomly assigned to four groups according to the injectable DME materials used: highly viscous glass ionomer (HVGI), high-filled injectable composite resin (ICR), resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI), and bioactive ionic resin (BAIR). The proximal subgingival margins were repositioned to a supragingival level using the assigned materials; subsequently, all groups received nanoceramic-resin CAD/CAM onlay restorations. Gingival health and restorative performance were assessed over a three-year evaluation period using the Gingival Index (GI) and modified World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. The collected data were statistically analyzed.
resultsAll restorations were evaluated with a 100% recall rate and a 100% survival rate. For GI, assessment of scores across various evaluation periods within each group revealed a significant increase over time. Nevertheless, no significant differences were found among the tested groups at each evaluation period. Additionally, FDI evaluation criteria showed no significant differences.
conclusionsAfter three years, nanoceramic-resin CAD/CAM onlay restorations following deep margin elevation with injectable restorative materials demonstrated acceptable clinical behavior, with only a slight increase in gingival bleeding. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Injectable restorative materials can provide adequate clinical performance as deep margin elevation materials for molars restored with nanoceramic-resin CAD/CAM onlays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.