ArticleClinical drug investigation2026
Therapeutic Strategies After Discontinuation of Valproate By Females with Epilepsy of Child-Bearing Potential: An Insurance Claims Database Study in France and the United Kingdom.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesUsing valproate during pregnancy carries risks of major congenital malformations and neurodevelopment disorders. Women with epilepsy and pregnancy plans should switch to an alternative and safe epilepsy management strategy. The present healthcare database study aimed at identifying treatment patterns that lead to successful epilepsy management and their associated factors, in females of childbearing potential (FCBP) after valproate discontinuation.
methodsFCBP who had been using valproate for epilepsy and discontinued its use (index date) between 2014 and 2017 were identified in the French and UK databases, Système National des Données de Santé/ Clinical Practice Research Datalink (SNDS/CPRD) and followed-up for 1 year. Clusters that most likely reflected a 'success' in epilepsy management were identified using a partition-around-medoids clustering algorithm. Success was defined on the basis of a combined approach including no valproate reintroduction and no negative medical parameters during follow-up. Baseline factors associated with successful/unsuccessful clusters were assessed in SNDS.
resultsA total of 7345/358 (SNDS/CPRD) FCBP diagnosed with epilepsy were included, of whom 67.3%/49.4% identified in successful clusters. The three most frequent clusters were 'predominantly no antiseizure medication (ASM)' (27.7%/20.9%), "predominantly monotherapy with another ASM' typically lamotrigine or levetiracetam (25.5%/20.7%), and 'predominantly return to valproate monotherapy' (17.5%/24.0%). Factors most strongly associated with no reintroduction of valproate were closer medical supervision (OR = 2.30), valproate dose-tapering prior discontinuation (OR = 2.40), pregnancy at index date (OR = 1.96), levetiracetam or lamotrigine delivery in the 90-days pre-index date (OR = 1.81, OR = 1.54). Factors most strongly associated with reintroduction of valproate included: older age (OR = 0.49 for [40-49] versus [13-29] year old), longer duration of epilepsy (OR = 0.63 for ≥ 5 versus < 1 year of history).
conclusionsAround half of women discontinued valproate successfully, especially if young, with a stabilised disease, with one quarter switching to monotherapy with another ASM, mainly lamotrigine or levetiracetam. Risk factors for unsuccessful discontinuation were identified, which may be useful as 'warning signs' to identify patients who need close follow-up during valproate discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.