ArticleCognitive processing2026
Multi-perspective spatial memory representation in the presence of others.
Article in Cognitive processing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to better adapt to spatial environments, individuals often establish a spatial frame of reference system to represent objects and their positions within a scene. This study utilized a partial scene recognition paradigm across three experiments (n = 91, 45 men, 46 women) to investigate egocentric spatial memory representation in the presence of others, as well as the conditions that facilitate individuals’ spatial memory representation from the perspectives of others. The aim of Experiment 1 (Exp. 1) was to investigate how people formed the egocentric memory representation in the absence of another person’s perspective. Exp. 2 studied whether the perspective that participants chose to represent the spatial scene changed when there was another person. Exp. 3 was based on Exp. 2, and further explored the role of one-way verbal cues initiated by others in promoting the memory representation of spatial scenes from others’ perspectives. The results indicated that when participants learned the scene alone, they represented the spatial layout solely from their own perspective. This representation did not change significantly with the mere presence of another person. However, when an assistant described the scene from her perspective, participants showed a recognition advantage for both perspectives. This suggest that the mere presence of others did not influence individuals’ egocentric memory representation, but that one-way verbal cues provided by others promoted individuals’ multi-perspective spatial memory representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41498870What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.