ArticleJournal of emergency nursing2026
Interrater Reliability in the Triage of Children With Mental and Behavioral Health Symptoms Using Two Triage Systems.
Article in Journal of emergency nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe Australian mental health triage scale is widely used in Australia to triage emergency department patients with behavioral health symptoms. The Australian mental health triage scale outperforms the Emergency Severity Index in distinguishing levels of urgency and meeting time-to-evaluation thresholds among adult patients, but its performance among children is not well studied. We aimed to determine the interrater reliability of acuity levels assigned using the Australian mental health triage scale and the Emergency Severity Index for children with behavioral health emergency department presentations.
methodsA convenience sample of triage-trained emergency nurses at 2 academic United States children's hospitals was surveyed. Nurses completed a brief training module describing behavioral health triage using the Australian mental health triage scale and the Emergency Severity Index. For 30 written case scenarios of emergency department presentations by children for behavioral health symptoms, nurses assigned acuity levels using the Australian mental health triage scale and the Emergency Severity Index. An interrater reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients was calculated.
resultsThirty participating emergency nurses reported a median of 7 years of experience working in the emergency department. Half of the acuity levels assigned using the Emergency Severity Index were level 2, whereas acuity levels assigned using the Australian mental health triage scale were more evenly distributed across levels. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89) for the Australian mental health triage scale and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.51-0.78) for the Emergency Severity Index. DISCUSSION: Among triage-trained nurses using written case scenarios, interrater reliability was high for the Australian mental health triage scale and moderate for the Emergency Severity Index, which may inform consistency of care provision. The wider distribution of acuity levels generated by the Australian mental health triage scale may enable greater differentiation of illness severity. Prospective studies are needed to assess the reliability and validity of the Australian mental health triage scale among pediatric patients in the emergency department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.