ArticleClinical chemistry and laboratory medicine2026
Secondary use of external quality assessment data - estimating inter-assay variation in LOINC-coded datasets.
Article in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The secondary scientific use of routine laboratory data will increasingly rely on LOINC as a semantic standard, particularly within the European Health Data Space (EHDS). LOINC enables the aggregation of large data sets from clinical care for research purposes, particularly in epidemiology. However, current approaches to semantic standardisation largely neglect metrological aspects - in particular, the considerable limitations of analytical standardisation for many fundamental analytes and the resulting scatter of result values across different assays that use common LOINC codes. This incomplete harmonisation leads to statistical uncertainty that must be taken into account when quantitative conclusions - such as diagnostic thresholds for analytes - are derived from aggregated, LOINC-derived data sets. In this opinion piece, we propose using the extensive global data pool generated by external quality assessment (EQA) programs to finally annotate LOINC codes with a sound and useful uncertainty metric. This represents secondary scientific use of EQA data that is analogous to and supports the secondary use of routine diagnostic data from patient care for research. With a proof-of-concept analysis, we demonstrate the feasibility of this approach, which offers a wide range of design options. We suggest that consortia of EQA providers, coding institutions, scientific societies, and the IVD industry could advance precision research through this concept. It is noteworthy that the proposed annotation strategy - linking semantic test codes to uncertainty metrics based on EQA data - is not limited to LOINC as a semantic coding system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41498700What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.