ArticleAIDS care2026
Methamphetamine use and HIV prevention: a qualitative study on challenges and opportunities for PrEP utilization.
Article in AIDS care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Provider Perspectives on the Delivery of Long-Acting PrEP for HIV Prevention to Men Who Have Sex with Men and Who Use Methamphetamine.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methamphetamine use often co-occurs with sexual behaviors that may increase HIV acquisition risk and disrupt adherence to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). To explore barriers and opportunities for PrEP among people who use methamphetamine, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 28 self-reported HIV-negative adults (ages 18-55) with current moderate-to-high risk methamphetamine use in the New York City metropolitan area. Transcripts were thematically analyzed with double coding and iterative consensus. Participants described sexualized methamphetamine use, polysubstance use, and sexual behaviors associated with increased HIV exposure risk (condomless intercourse, group sex, transactional sex, encounters with unfamiliar partners). Awareness of PrEP was high (86%), whereas 46% reported current use. Adherence frequently decreased during periods of heavy methamphetamine and polysubstance use, despite self-management strategies (e.g., phone/calendar reminders). Reported obstacles included insurance coverage interruptions, concerns about side effects, and reluctance to discuss sexual health with clinicians. Interest in long-acting PrEP was considerable (71% would try injections; 57% would try implants), though some expressed concerns about comparative efficacy, visit adherence, and access. Findings suggest that long-acting formulations may mitigate daily dosing burdens, particularly if delivered in settings already accessed by this population. Prospective clinical studies, ideally randomized trials, are needed to determine whether long-acting PrEP improves adherence and reduces HIV incidence in methamphetamine-using populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.