ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2026
Medication errors involving parenteral nutrition preparations and concentrated electrolytes in a pediatric hospital: A qualitative analysis.
Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParenteral nutrition and concentrated electrolytes are associated with medication errors in pediatrics; however, a systems-based understanding of these errors is lacking. We aimed to describe the errors, contributing factors, and proposed defenses related to these medications in pediatrics.
methodsThe study analyzed self-reported medication safety incidents at a pediatric university hospital between 2018 and 2020, focusing on parenteral nutrition and concentrated electrolytes. The reports were investigated through qualitative content analysis, and the results were quantified in frequencies and percentages. Consequently, the Institute for Safe Medication Practices' Hierarchy of Effectiveness of Risk-Reduction Strategies was used to categorize the proposed safety defenses. The analysis used a systems approach to medication risk management, guided by the theory of human error.
resultsIn total, 404 medication errors, 627 contributing factors, and 386 proposed defenses were identified within the study sample (n = 279 incident reports). Most errors occurred during the administration (54%) and preparation (25%) phases. Common issues included wrong dose (15%), wrong infusion rate (11%), and incorrectly prepared medicine (18%). Contributing factors were often linked to workload and resources (22%) and employee-related factors (21%). Most proposed defenses were classified as low leverage (71%), with the smallest portion at the highest leverage (6%).
conclusionsErrors often occur during preparation and administration, primarily because of the complexity of individualized dosing. Contributing factors include high workload, limited resources, and employee-related factors. Hospitals should prioritize implementing systems-based, technology-driven defenses over person-focused strategies. Future research is essential for developing and evaluating child-specific defenses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.