ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Brazilian obstetricians in relation to childbirth care.
Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cesarean section rates in Lucas do Rio Verde, Brazil: Assessing the impact of socioeconomic status and maternal and neonatal outcomes.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of obstetricians regarding childbirth care.
methodsThis was a nationwide cross-sectional study involving 1267 physicians working in 393 public and private hospitals in Brazil. A self-administered and anonymous questionnaire, developed specifically for this study, was used. Differences in proportions among obstetricians working in public, mixed, and private services were analyzed using the chi-square test, with a significance level of 0.05.
resultsHigh levels of knowledge, favorable attitudes, and adoption of best practices in childbirth care were observed for diet, movement, the presence of a companion, and non-pharmacological methods for pain relief. Limitations were identified regarding the participation of nurse-midwives in childbirth care, the use of instrumental delivery, promotion of upright birth positions, and the use of episiotomy. Fear of legal action and unnecessary indications for cesarean sections were frequently reported by professionals as reasons for the country's high cesarean section rates, and should be addressed in medical schools and specialization courses. A more positive perception of cesarean delivery as safe, and the defense of cesarean section as a woman's right, were more common in private services, where there was also less acceptance of births attended by nurse-midwives.
conclusionDifferences observed between public and private services may inform the development of new strategies and strengthen ongoing initiatives in Brazil, with the aim of reducing cesarean section rates and promoting best practices in childbirth care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.