SynthesisScandinavian journal of work, environment & health2026
Chronotype differences in the risk of cancers, diabetes mellitus, and poor mental health among shift workers: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveShift work is associated with various leading causes of premature death, which has been linked with individuals with specific chronotypes. This study synthesized evidence on chronotype's role in associations between ever shift work and health outcomes.
methodsSix databases were searched (inception-September 2025) for cohort/case-control studies assessing chronotype-specific shift work impacts on breast/prostate cancer, diabetes mellitus, and mental health. PRISMA guidelines were used for reporting.
resultsFourteen studies were included in the review, comprising 2247 breast cancer cases, 3045 prostate cancer cases, 336 218 participants in diabetes studies, and 2128 poor mental health cases. Compared to daytime workers, both night shift workers with morning or evening chronotypes were more susceptible to breast cancer [morning type: pooled odds ratio (OR) 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-2.37; evening type: pooled OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.04-1.90) and poor mental health (morning type: pooled OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.27; evening type: pooled OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.17]. Notably, night shift workers with evening chronotype were 84% more likely to develop prostate cancer than daytime workers. A positive dose-response relationship was identified between cumulative years of night shifts and prostate cancer among night shift workers with evening chronotype, indicating a 2.1% increase in risk for each additional year (P=0.012).
conclusionsChronotype-matched scheduling does not effectively mitigate night shift risks. Nevertheless, evening chronotype night shift workers are particularly susceptible to various chronic non-communicable diseases, with a notable positive dose-response relationship observed between prostate cancer and evening chronotype night shift workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.