ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2025
Strategic cancer therapy planning: optimizing treatment and quality of life with Markov decision processes.
Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From mechanistic models to artificial intelligence: exploring the potential of digital twins in geriatric oncology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In managing the progression of diseases, particularly cancer, Markov decision processes (MDP) and dynamic therapy regimes are gaining prominence. Despite this, cancer treatments often negatively impact patients' quality of life, leading many to abandon effective, accessible, and affordable therapies. Materials and methods: This paper introduces a novel MDP-based mathematical framework for optimizing multi-therapy treatment schedules in malignancy therapy. Through practical illustrations, we demonstrate the utility and applicability of the proposed framework. Our approach integrates both patient utility and the physician's net benefit function, accounting for treatment options and survival probabilities across diverse clinical profiles. The system state in our MDP model is defined by tumor progression and normal tissue side effects, while the response field encompasses treatment outcomes categorized into recurrence, tumor regression, and healthy tissue safety. At each decision stage, the physician assesses the patient's condition and selects the optimal treatment strategy to maximize the final reward, determined by the patient's health at the end state. Results/Conclusions: This framework offers a holistic approach to improving overall treatment outcomes while recognizing the importance of preserving patients' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.